Why Evangelicals Need to Vote For Mitt Romney

by Roger Resler

I’m one of those Republicans who did not vote for Mitt Romney in the primaries. There are a few of us, forgotten though we may be. There are a number of reasons I preferred Cain, and then Santorum. But Romney is now our guy. And, as Republicans, now is the time to step up to the plate and whole-heartedly support him. But what about “as conservatives” or “as evangelicals”? Bottom line is that, now more than ever, conservatives and evangelicals alike need to support Governor Romney.

To some of the Latter-day Saints I’ve verbally sparred with over the years, these words might come as a surprise, if not a shock. But they shouldn’t. I will explain in a moment.

What I really want to address is the idea that some evangelicals, and more specifically conservative evangelicals, might prefer to either stay home or vote for someone like Ron Paul (as a write-in), rather than cast their vote for a Mormon. I understand that sentiment. I have studied Mormonism for over a decade. During that time I have become familiar with Joseph Smith and the history he claims “no man knows.” In short, over the last decade, I have become a rather passionate critic of Joseph Smith, which, in turn, has led to some interesting online conversations with Latter-day Saints. While I don’t consider myself “anti-Mormon,” no doubt many of the Latter-day Saints I’ve interacted with would so characterize me because I speak very critically of their beloved, founding prophet.

Given that, it might come as a surprise that I would whole-heartedly support the Mormon in the race over someone who claims to be a believer in the biblical Jesus Christ. This dynamic has, admittedly, given me pause. But in the end, I believe there are very clear and good reasons to support Mitt Romney over Barack Obama. To a certain extent, as a by-product, this paradox emphasizes the fact that I am, as asserted, not “anti-Mormon” despite what some of my Latter-day Saint friends may be tempted to think. Rather, I am, quite simply, anti-Mormonism. And there is a difference. A big difference. And it’s a difference that is illustrated through the dynamic of a presidential contest in which we have a conservative Mormon running against a liberal Christian.

Here’s what I mean. If Mormonism were running for president against biblical Christianity, then the dynamic would be entirely different. There is no way I could vote for “Mormonism” for president over “Christianity.” But that is not at all what we have. Instead, we have a practicing Mormon running against a practicing Christian (or at least a professing Christian. I would put Mitt Romney’s record of religious devotion up against Obama’s any day). And that is what makes all the difference in the world. A vote for Mitt Romney is not a vote for Mormonism. It is not a vote for Joseph Smith or Thomas Monson. More importantly, it’s not a vote against Christianity. It’s a vote for conservative values and principles over big-government, big-taxes, big-regulation and gross financial irresponsibility.

Mitt Romney has a proven track record of fixing financial messes. Barack Obama has a proven track record of exacerbating them. It’s as simple as that.

To my fellow evangelicals who find themselves reluctant to vote for a Mormon, I say: You are not voting for Mormonism. You are voting for a decent man with a proven track record in exactly the area we most desperately need; who also happens to be a Mormon. I would love the opportunity to have a serious discussion with Mitt Romney about why I sincerely believe his faith in Joseph Smith is misguided. But the place for that discussion is not a voting booth.

If you are hesitant to vote for a Mormon, as one who can sympathize with that sentiment, let me respectfully encourage you to consider the consequences of the alternative or even merely sitting this one out. We have a clear choice. Reckless spending vs. tough but necessary fiscal responsibility. A job-killer vs. a job-creator. A partisan liberal with soaring but meaningless rhetoric about the need to “work together” vs. a Republican Governor of a liberal state who actually worked with Democrats. Disastrous and incompetent foreign policy that has led to disrespect vs. a disciplined, no apologies leader. And a wildly liberal pro-abortion proponent vs. someone legitimately converted to a pro-life stance.

To me the choice is clear. In fact, it could lead to a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. If evangelicals help put Romney in the White House, then I would think we might be entitled to send a couple of our own smiling missionaries knocking at his door, say, in about 4 years.

3 thoughts on “Why Evangelicals Need to Vote For Mitt Romney

  1. This is short term wisdom, and long term foolishness. If we hold our nose and vote for Governor Romney and he wins- the Establishment in the Republican part will know they can put forth ANY candidate and will just vote for them. Why? Because they are better then the alternative. Reinforcing, the idea that all you need to do is throw the Christian-right a few crumbs and they will be content. This is not winning – but losing. Instead, we need to send a clear message to the Repubican Establishment and this will be the last Mormon to win the nomination for the office of president. Logically, voting for the lesser of two evils will ultimately bring us worst and worst choices down the road. “Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be strong.”

    • Hi Brian. Thank you for your response. I understand, and to a certain extent, share your concerns. However, in my opinion, your own words reveal the flaw in the logic. You suggest that the Rep. establishment will know they can “put forth ANY candidate” and conservative evangelicals will vote for them because “they are better than the alternative.

      This may be a bit of a hard truth, Brian, but up to a point they are correct in that thinking. Romney is, by far, better than the alternative. And that’s what our choice boils down to at this point. The time to defeat the Republican establishment is in the primary, not the general election. To not vote, is to vote for Obama. A vote for Ron Paul or Gary Johnson, is, at best, a wasted vote because neither will win and, at worst, a vote for Obama.

      Brian, with all due respect, I am very concerned that too many evangelicals feel like you feel and will not vote for Mitt Romney at a time when the alternative is going to put the greatest experiment in freedom, capitalism and democracy the world has ever seen into bankruptcy.

      You write that: “Logically, voting for the lesser of two evils will ultimately bring us worst and worst choices down the road.” I respectfully beg to differ and suggest that, logically, voting for the worst of two evils brings us evil via overnight delivery.

  2. RIGHT ON! I do not believe Mitt Romney is evil (just deceived as far as his religion is concerned), but I DO believe that Mr. O IS evil!! May God have mercy on this country!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s